But it was one of the most enormously cruel and frighteningly witty put downs ever. well, I can't actually remember exactly what I said. You can also put the same app in a few different categories of course which would make finding Foo a little easier. Then again, if I know what it's called I can just do Cmd-Space and type the first few letters and LaunchBar will find it for me.īut if you don't have launchbar, then using the aliases in your own applications folder seems like a good solution. If I know what something's called I can find it easily within an alphabetical list. You have to think, now what type of application is Foo and then open that folder and find Foo. If you know you're looking for an application called Foo. Waaay back in OS9 days I used to organise my applications into subfolders (Graphics, Sound, Video, Utilities, etc) but in the end I gave up and reverted to one folder for all because it just got in the way. I have to agree, that sounds like the best approach. (Am I right in thinking that Panther users could also add it to the Finder's sidebar?)ĭon't forget that this approach would also allow individual users to organize the applications to their own preferences, and all done through the GUI! I've added it to my dock so I can right-click to get a contextual menu of all my applications in categories. I mix applications installed for my own use with aliases of the ones installed for all users. You can organise the aliases into sub folders until your heart's content. Wouldn't it be simpler to just create an alternative Applications (& Utilities) folder, containing aliases of the applications you want to include? I keep it in my Home folder. However, moving all your applications and putting symlinks in their place sounds like more work than necessary, especially if you've be a got a lot off apps, and/or could cause unforseen problems when updating in the future. app idea is a great one and not always used to its full potential. a sym link to FileMaker Pro 6 won't work when you replace it with an app called FileMaker Pro 7). Ln -s /Library/Application\ Support/AppleWorks/AppleWorks.app/ /Applications/ln -s /Library/Application\ Support/FileMaker\ Pro/FileMaker\ Pro.app/ /Applications/ln -s /Library/Application\ Support/Microsoft\ Office/Microsoft\ Word/ /Applications/etc.Also be sure to remove any versioning information in the names before hand (e.g. To create symlinks from the terminal type (as an admin user): One could also use aliases, but if you replace the program with a new version, the symlink will still resolve to the correct file (assuming it has the same name of course). To overcome the limitations in these programs, I dragged each folder over to /Library -> Application Support/, and then created symbolic links to the applications in /Applications. Excel, PowerPoint and Word) refuse to even start up when you do this. However, many of these applications misplace their templates, plug-ins and support files, and the particularly iconoclastic programs (i.e. Ideally, to remedy this one would simply place the application folder in /Library -> Application Support, and drag the application itself back to /Applications. The Macromedia family also follow this pattern. AppleWorks, FileMaker Pro and the Microsoft family (we'll count Microsoft as a spin-off because Windows owes a lot to Mac OS) all hide their applications in a sub-folder of the Applications folder. There are a few notable exceptions, however, and interestingly they are mostly Apple spin-offs. These days, you can open most applications with just a double-click from the Applications folder. Under OS 9, all but the simplest applications had their own folder inside the Applications folder, so getting to anything required extra clicks or extra contextual menus. I'm a big fan of Mac OS X's ".app" package format for applications.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |